In the times of crisis,
the Sexuarium may turn into the meeting place
of those who need something
and those who are willing to satisfy this need.

Sex-support (and even services) can be offered legally

Besides those who are fully tranquil in their celibacy or marriage (with the only support: the traditional bedroom), the vast majority of us needs some support and/or services connected with sexuality. Many of them can be offered legally, on the proper level of safety (both health & criminal) and while paying taxes. There can be many sorts of support and services both for the married (registered) and for the singles.

In the times of massive unemployment, many persons - probably even some of you, dear reader? - will ponder whether to earn for livelihood providing some of the sex-services/sorts of support. While it is dubious if it is at the level of human dignity to offer the prostitute services, supposed such activities are connected with the health and criminal risks, for some of us the legal sub-set of the sex-services can be admissible, thanks to our psychical-body features and character. 

Sex-services compared with the other options for an unemployed person

In the position of an unemployed person, we are to compare the legal sex-services with the other options of an unemployerd person: the state aid or making a fool from oneself in an absurd job, often below our qualification.

Sex is one of the strongest motivations of ours which makes self-evident that there must exist an extremely large market around it; and there arise some other pro's in our decision-making. Sex is a must-have which markets itself, with an immense target group, independently of how prosperous the times are or not.

Sex concerns the global problems of demography/ecology, the family-crisis and of the HIV/AIDS-curbing, and so there will probably arise some government commissions.

The support of the legal sex has been still under-developed - a colossal niche: is there any marketing-field, dealing in the basic needs, alike? - All these arguments support, as I hope, my contention that it is worth to ponder whether search for our providing such sex-sevices or sex-support which could sustain us. 

The most absurd, in my opinion, is the labelling of sex as essentially below dignity - while the common jobs as venerable. How often I would have preferred to offer some sex-service to the humiliation in this or that job...!

The examples of fundamental mistakes in some other spheres

Considering if it is not over-ambitious to put forth a new market of as an essential sphere as sexuality, we can find astounding ignoring of obvious facts not in one, but in several realms! Probably, even in the universities, the scientists are ready to overlook evident facts, not to lose their jobs due to the accusation of undermining the theory of their teacher, or of subversive activity against the establishment itself. And so, we can meet theses which problematise entire scientific branches; my thesis about the legal sex-services maybe among them.

• What did the university departments of economy before the crisis, not alerting about the risky prodromes/presages/portents...? Were it only a few comedians who were able to notice the risks?
• Do the churches not see corruption? One would suppose they would say NO to it supposed their main "industry" is consists in their communication with the divine Jusitce. Why does not the pope exert his capacity to ban the corruptionists?
• If installing one powerful Political Action Committee to a country, how can the university departments of politics call such an establishment "democracy" - though it is evident that it is missing some basic features of democracy?
• If a totalitarian regime was introduced supported by weapons, there is no reason - while returning to democracy - not to punish the actors of the coup d'état according the law against a militant subversion of the state, valid in the time of the putsch. And yet, I live in a country (CZ) where there operate several law universities, including their professors of the law history and philosophy, without mentioning this fundamental feature of the stalinist takeovers in 1940/50's.
• We can add to these abysmal flaws of the establishments and their scientists the now hypothesis which is fortunately not a moral defect of someone, yet it is over-valuating too many books and theories, I mean: the new theory about the dark matter and dark energy which probably fill-in the majority of Cosmos.

All these sorts of weirdness enable us (or at least release us) to contend that a large industry around sex has been missing.

To be continued...